Andrew Chen Archives

Subscribe · Featured · Recent · The Cold Start Problem 📘
Dear readers, I have moved to Substack and I will be writing here from now on:
👉 andrewchen.substack.com
In the meantime, I will leave andrewchen.com up for posterity. Enjoy!

Eyeball companies versus revenue companies

I have been spending a lot of time talking about and thinking about starting a new business. With a multi-month “windup” process like an EIR, you have a surprising amount of time to think about your interests and constraints. I think typically, without a process like this, I’d probably start tinkering away on any ol’ thing that caught my eye – I simply enjoy building new ideas, and the decision-making process on this stuff is a week or two at most, and then a couple months of initial commitment, rather than six months of hard thinking.

In fact, at this point, I’ve probably had six projects I’d count as startup-y. Many of them didn’t go anywhere, but they were all designed to be used by other people, starting with a real estate app when I was 17. Here’s a quick list of things I spent multiple months on, with other people, starting at the top:

  • Apartment listings website focused on deep coverage in local markets (never shipped since we built too many features early on)
  • Automated used book/CD/media UPC scanner and software that instantly prices and posts listings on eBay (useful for used bookstores and charities)
  • BitTorrent search engine and client embedded in an Internet Explorer toolbar (launched on Slashdot!)
  • Video website for requesting and posting BitTorrent videos with one click client (doh, people don’t like downloading clients)
  • Video website for posting Flash videos with one click from the browser (built over a couple weeks, eventually getting 15k+ videos)
  • Social shopping website for bookmarking and sharing products (doh, don’t try to build stuff for women)

I also have lots of random start-and-stop personal projects, but I don’t think these count. I could write for hours on the lessons from each of these projects, but most importantly, I’m glad that we did them. We did manage to sell one of the projects, which is always nice. (Note that this makes me 1 for 6, woohoo!)

Starting a new company is a deeply personal endevour
First off, it’s clear that starting a new company requires a lot of introspection. I think it’s very easy (and misleading) to figure out areas where you can make money, and just build that. Instead, realize that building a company requires 4 or 5 years (YouTube aside) and you have to do it in an area where you have a lot of interest and energy.

For me, that means realizing that ultimately, I get excited by the idea that random normal people use the stuff I build, and that interaction seems really tangible and interesting. I spent the last 5 years of my life helping people invest in B2B companies and working in B2B online advertising, but you can see from my projects that they were all pretty consumer-oriented.

Building for yourself (at least somewhat)
Another opportunity that was really tempting was to build products for people significantly different than me. It’s easy to go to a Walmart and see the huge outdoors section, with BB guns, fishing gear, etc. and say, “gee, that’s a huge market that no one owns – I’m going to make a big Web 2.0 outdoors company!” The problem is, when you don’t relate much to the product, and instead relate onto to “people” and “money,” I think ultimately it’s very hard to be a good steward of that product.

It took me a while to be convinced of this: A couple months back, I ran my friend Max Noy through a couple concepts like this over brunch, and he said, “Andrew, I’m sure you can make money a bunch of ways but I don’t see that as your style.” He proceeded to talk about how to take things in your life and build products to solve those problems, and why hobbies are important and useful for this reason. Thanks Max, your advice has been helpful – now leave Microsoft already :)

Does building for eyeballs work?
Another interesting question is the current vogue of “building for eyeballs.” What this means is the temptation to make things that are useful for people without any business constraints. If you just wanted people, things like communication tools and media sharing are particularly useful for getting eyeballs.

I think this is a perfectly legit strategy, if you have an eyeball company RIGHT NOW. After all, two kinds of companies are getting exits – first, companies with lots of revenue and actual businesses. The second kind are eyeball companies where dollars are being spent in anticipation of media spend following eyeballs. Anything in the middle – small without a ton of revenue – aren’t going anywhere, whereas in the last bubble they were going public!

But if you are going to start a company now, and get to maturity in 3 or 4 years, you simply don’t know if a purely eyeball company can succeed. So I think the right thing to do is to use the tools that make an eyeball company successful – great interfaces, tapping user emotions, viral growth strategies – and apply them to areas that can clearly hold value even if our little mini-bubble pops.

Anyway, that’s where I net out after 2 months of thinking about the problem – good thing I can defer making a decision for a while longer!

PS. Get new updates/analysis on tech and startups

I write a high-quality, weekly newsletter covering what's happening in Silicon Valley, focused on startups, marketing, and mobile.

Views expressed in “content” (including posts, podcasts, videos) linked on this website or posted in social media and other platforms (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) are my own and are not the views of AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. AH Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell -- or a solicitation of an offer to buy -- any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The content should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, I have not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. The content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website -- or on associated content distribution outlets -- be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles -- which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters. There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available at https://a16z.com/investments/. Excluded from this list are investments for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly as well as unannounced investments in publicly traded digital assets. Past results of Andreessen Horowitz’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Please see https://a16z.com/disclosures for additional important information.