Andrew Chen Archives

Subscribe · Featured · Recent · The Cold Start Problem 📘
Dear readers, I have moved to Substack and I will be writing here from now on:
In the meantime, I will leave up for posterity. Enjoy!

Quick professional update, and what an Entrepreneur-in-Residence actually does ;-)

The story so far

As of the new year, I am finishing up my quick tour of the venture capital industry.

I spent most of 2007 affiliated with Mohr Davidow Ventures, where I started out as an Entrepreneur-in-Residence, and then transitioned into a consulting role about mid-way through the year. It was a great experience – more on that below.

As I mentioned in a previous post, What is an Entrepreneur-in-Residence, the key elements of a program like that are that:

  • EIRs come from industry with background in a specific area, in my case advertising
  • They are sponsored by a partner to start a company after some time period (let’s say 3 months to a year)
  • EIRs may come in with a specific idea, or not – in my case, not :)
  • They find team members, incubate the idea, and find funding
  • The EIRs will also often work with the investment team to do due diligence on new companies coming in
  • There is no quid-pro-quo that you have to get funding from the
    specific firm the EIR is at, and no guarantee the VC will fund the

Of course, I wanted to get into the thick of it right away.

I had a preconceived notion that I’d get an office, start
working on a project, and 6 months into it, be pitching for capital. In fact, in anticipation for the EIR program, I spent 2 months up in Seattle meeting with all the folks I could from the games industry. I was in a big hurry to reach an idea and start working on it ASAP.

What I really did
The wise advice of several of the partners (Thanks Jon & Dave!) was NOT to jump right in, but instead focus on being a sponge and absorbing what the Bay Area had to offer. After all, the entire point of why entrepreneurs thrive has to do with the environment, people, and resources. Moving here from Seattle and not immersing myself would be a big shame.

As a result, I turned my attention to going to dozens of events including:

The focus here was to meet as many folks as I could from the San Francisco area, from all walks of life, and pick their brains about everything. I remember that in my first 4-5 months at MDV, I almost never ate at the Sundeck, which is pretty much the only choice for food on Sand Hill Road but instead spent it driving all over the place. I met 2 or 3 new people every day, which was great.

4 months on the conference circuit was enough for me – it started to get boring, particularly the ones that evolved purely around Internet media. The best conferences were the ones on games, mobile, entertainment, etc., which were peripherally related to online media, but only somewhat. From there, you could get a different angle on the world we live in.

My goal shifted into finding a co-founder, and moving on to prototyping some new ideas.

The venture capital business
Along the way, it was a very compelling opportunity to get to see entrepreneurs and deals coming through the door. With my background in online advertising, these were the types of Internet businesses I looked at:

  1. Businesses that either were advertising plays in themselves (infrastructure, ad networks, etc.)
  2. Or, they depended on advertising to monetize
  3. Or, they depended on advertising to acquire users

Of course, in 2007, that pretty much constituted 99% of the Internet companies that came through the door ;-)

Overall, I was very impressed by the venture process, and the honesty and integrity of the people involved. The highest consideration was given to reaching decisions quickly, giving insightful analysis, and providing useful relationships. I saw this across the board, not just at MDV but also with other firms I interacted with.

The biggest lesson I learned was about the way VCs qualify deals, and that in many cases, getting venture money is not the right thing to do for the business – and that’s OK. I saw many companies which I thought would be strong, profitable companies, but didn’t have billion dollar potential. In many of these cases, the companies are likely to do quite well, but things might actually be a less optimal outcome for them if they took venture money.

Another important thing I learned was that, for all the ways that the VC industry is opaque to outsiders, the folks are actually very accessible. It was hard not to run into people I knew from the venture industry at any and every conference, regardless of what city it was hosted in. I also continue to see VCs blogging, which is great, because you can always send them an e-mail and start a conversation about anything.

Also, one nice outcome of immersing myself in the conference circuit was that I was able to bring a couple interesting companies to the partnership. One company that was funded, as a result, was Hi5, and the other is still unannounced.

Conclusion and next steps
Overall, the experience at MDV was great, and I would do it again. For entrepreneurs, I think EIR programs are a great way to transition into a new geography, or market, or otherwise learn a lot more about the industry.

Later in the year, I ended up transitioning into a consulting role as a motivation developed to live in San Francisco rather than down in the peninsula. Also, I had ended up finding a co-founder for working on prototypes, and we wanted to go and learn from the best internet folks – which today, are mostly located up in the city particularly around the SoMa area. We’re still continuing to tinker away on a couple projects.

And I won’t leave it unsaid – Happy 2008 everyone! ;-)

PS. Get new updates/analysis on tech and startups

I write a high-quality, weekly newsletter covering what's happening in Silicon Valley, focused on startups, marketing, and mobile.

Views expressed in “content” (including posts, podcasts, videos) linked on this website or posted in social media and other platforms (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) are my own and are not the views of AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. AH Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell -- or a solicitation of an offer to buy -- any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The content should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, I have not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. The content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website -- or on associated content distribution outlets -- be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles -- which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters. There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available at Excluded from this list are investments for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly as well as unannounced investments in publicly traded digital assets. Past results of Andreessen Horowitz’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Please see for additional important information.